Architecture Judgment Index

75 system design decisions beyond the standard question bank

Built for Staff, Principal, Architect, and senior engineering leadership interviews. Practice ambiguous trade-offs, migrations, blast-radius reasoning, multi-region consistency, cost, security, and the judgment behind an architecture review.

75
original questions
10
decision domains
2
complete samples
35–90m
interview depth
10 Senior · 30 Staff · 25 Principal · 10 Distinguished

What the interview is really testing

Architecture judgment under incomplete information

These are not component-recitation prompts. Each scenario forces a candidate to identify the decision, make assumptions explicit, protect invariants, plan failure and recovery, price the options, and lead a realistic change from the system and organization that already exist.

Trade-off discipline

State what wins, what loses, and which new evidence would reverse the choice.

Failure and recovery

Define blast radius, degraded behavior, reconciliation, rollback, and operational proof.

Evolutionary delivery

Move from the current architecture through observable, reversible stages instead of a flag day.

Staff-level influence

Connect technical decisions to ownership, incentives, cost, policy, and cross-team execution.

Coverage

Ten decision domains

Balanced across distributed systems, data, reliability, platform, security, performance, evolution, economics, and leadership.

7 questions

Build the primitives behind the decisions

Pair the index with InterviewVector's Distributed Systems field manual, system design case studies, and the AI Architect track.

Explore Staff Prep